Legal Opinion
Berdych v. Department of Employment and Training
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 10, 1986No. 399, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BISHOP, Judge.
After becoming unemployed, Gerard Berdych, appellant, filed a claim for unemployment insurance benefits with the Department of Employment and Training (DET). A claims examiner determined that because appellant quit his employment without good cause, he was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits pursuant to MD.ANN. CODE art. 95A, § 6(a).
Berdych appealed his disqualification and a DET hearing examiner, after conducting a full evidentiary hearing, affirmed the denial of benefits. Steadfastly contending that he is eligible for benefits, appellant challenged the claims and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Iselin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Amalgamated Casualty Insurance v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Sites v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Beye v. Bureau of National AffairsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Uniweld Products, Inc. v. INDUSTRIAL REL. COM'N, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc. v. Department of Employment & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Total Audio-Visual Systems, Inc. v. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Total Audio-Visual Systems, Inc. v. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Total Audio-Visual Systems, Inc. v. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000