Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Parks v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaRKSON, J.

The defendants contend that the order of the board of county commissioners was “in accordance with the authority Tested in said board by the special acts of the Legislature of North Carolina, constituting road laws for said county, and appearing in chapter 259, Public Laws 1907, and chapter 46, Public Laws 1913.” The reference to chapter 46, Public Laws 1913, should be, and was intended to be, “Public-Local Laws of North Carolina, Session 1913.” It will be noted that the repealing clause in the 1913 act says: “That chapter 259 of the Public Law^s of 1907 and.all the laws and clauses of law in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brodnax v. GroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  2. Sherrill v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Johnston v. . RankinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  4. Rosenthal v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Jeffress v. Town of GreenvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rouse v. City of KinstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Dayton v. . AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Long v. Town of RockinghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Electric Short Line Terminal Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Brown v. . TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API