Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Rochford v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1892No. 506PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Original Application for Prohibition. The facts are stated in the opinion. ■

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J. —

The relator is the prosecuting attorney of Yakima county; the respondent, Hon. Solomon Smith, is the superior judge of Klickitat county, and, by reason of the disqualification of Hon. Carroll B. Graves, superior judge of Yakima county, to try a certain cause, entitled Benton et al. v. Johncox et al., Judge Smith was, in December last, called to preside at the trial of that cause. The cause thus on trial is a civil action, to which neither the state nor Yakima county is a party. On the 18th day of December the court made an order directing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Nooksack River Boom Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Stowell v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Foster & Foster v. County of ClintonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  4. State ex rel. Reed v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Turner & Co. v. Woodbury CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Powhatan Coal & Coke Co. v. RitzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Daniel v. DanielWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State ex rel. Examining & Trial Board v. JacksonMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Cronan v. District CourtIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  5. State ex rel. Pelton v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API