Legal Opinion
Richie v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 9, 1994No. Docket Nos. A056799, A058407PublishedCited by 7 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REARDON, J.
—On plaintiffs Michael and Lynn Richie’s1 action for personal injuries, the trial court entered judgments for defendants Bridgestone/ Firestone, Inc., Wagner Electric Corporation and Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. The trial court also awarded sanctions to Bridgestone and Wagner. In consolidated appeals from the judgments and the sanctions order, appellant Lynn Richie contends that (1) the nonsuits granted to Wagner and Bridge-stone/Firestone are no longer valid after our decision in Wheeler v. Raybestos Manhattan (1992) 8 Cal.App.4th 1152 [11 Cal.Rptr.2d 109] (Wheeler); (2) the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Newman v. Emerson Radio Corp.California Supreme Court · 1989
- Hilliard v. A. H. Robins Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Wheeler v. Raybestos-ManhattanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Cummings v. MorezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Sanderson v. International Flavors & Fragrancies, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1996
- Hamilton v. Accu-TekDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Setliff v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.