Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Accu-Tek
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 3, 1999No. CV-95-0049 (JBW)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM, ORDER AND JUDGMENT
WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge.
[[Image here]]
I. INTRODUCTION. 00 O 00
II. FACTS . A. Stephen Fox . B. Njuzi Ray. C. Roberto Robles. D. Leroy Sabb . E. Damon Slade. F. Kei Sunada. G. Marvin Zaretsky. C0 00 05 05 0Q050 OOOOOOOt-H COOOCOCOOOOOOOCO
III. PROCEDURAL HISTORY.
A. Pre-Trial Proceedings.
B. Claims of Parties and Jury Instructions.
C. Verdicts.
1. Negligence.
2. Proximate Cause.
3. Damages.
a. Veronica Trott and Koichi Sunada .
b. Stephen Fox.
IV. LAW AND ITS APPLICATION.
A. Motion to Dismiss — Collateral Estoppel.
1. Law.
2. Application.
B. Motion to Amend…
2Cases cited107 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
- City of Philadelphia v. Beretta U.S.A., Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Falise v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2000
- Sharp International Corp. v. State Street Bank & Trust Co. (In Re Sharp International Corp.)District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- People v. Sturm, Ruger & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.