Legal Opinion

People v. Davis

California Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1965No. Crim. 8529PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Petitioner, under rule 31(a) of the California Rules of Court, seeks relief from his default in failing to file his notice of appeal within the 10-day period required by that rule. The rule itself provides for the granting of such relief in a proper case, and it is now settled law that the power thus conferred should be liberally exercised to avoid, if reasonably possible, the loss of the right to appeal. (See People v. Madrid, ante, pp. 602, 603 [43 Cal.Rptr. 638, 400 P.2d 750], where many of the prior cases so holding are cited and discussed.)

The Attorney General and counsel for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. DiehlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. People v. FlanaganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. AcostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. CamarilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API