Legal Opinion

Pelinsky v. Rockensies

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In related actions to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), entered May 3, 1993, which granted the motion of the defendants Arnold Sokoloff and Carolyn Sokoloff for summary judgment dismissing the mplaints insofar as they are asserted against them.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that no action against the defendants Arnold and Carolyn Sokoloff was viable under General Obligations Law § 11-100. General…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. MacGilvray v. DeninoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rust v. ReyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Lane v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Rust v. ReyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API