Legal Opinion

Rust v. Reyer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 13, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.), dated November 28, 1995, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Arthur Reyer, Sheila Reyer, and Heidi Reyer which was for summary judgment dismissing the second cause of action insofar as asserted against Heidi Reyer.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that there was no viable cause of action against the defendant Heidi Reyer under General Obligations…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. D'Amico v. ChristieNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. MacGilvray v. DeninoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Pelinsky v. RockensiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lane v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Guercia v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API