Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Smith

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 7, 2005No. 2040335PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff William Sullivan ("the plaintiff"), acting pro se, appeals a summary judgment in favor of the defendants William Smith and Karen Smith ("the Smiths"). We affirm.

In April 1990, the plaintiff was convicted of murdering the Smiths' son and was sentenced to life in prison. The plaintiff became eligible for parole in 2003, and, in order to determine whether he should be granted parole, the Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles ("the Board") received testimony from witnesses at a hearing on October 27, 2003. The Board heard witnesses on behalf of both the plaintiff and the victim's…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. NielsenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Ex Parte the Alabama Great Southern R.R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Ellard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Ex Parte BallewSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. O'BARR v. FeistSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. James Carnes v. Mary Elizabeth Carnes.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  2. Kocontes v. McQuaidNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Witherow v. State Board of Parole CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Fred Auston Wortman, III v. Eric ShirkeyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API