Legal Opinion

Wimmer v. Filizola

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 27, 1951No. 38,123PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This was an action to recover damages for breach of implied warranties on the part of defendant in failing to construct a frozen food locker plant in conformity with the terms of a construction contract.

The all decisive issue raised by the appeal is such that detailed allegations of the pleadings are of little consequence and would merely encumber our opinion. For that reason all pleadings will be briefly summarized.

Plaintiff’s third amended petition filed in the district court of Rourbon county on June 24,1949, alleges the execution of a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Walker v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. Mckay v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Mo. River, Fort Scott & Gulp Rld. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  4. Smith v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Hamson v. BabbittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. KIMEL v. BriggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API