Legal Opinion

Smith v. Jones

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1937No. 33,362PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This was an action upon a promissory note alleged by the plaintiff to have been purchased by him from the payee thereof before maturity for a valuable consideration and without knowledge of any defect therein or defense thereto and that he was the holder thereof in due course.

The answer admits the execution of the note and alleges that it was executed by reason of false representations and fraud of the payee thereof, setting the same out in detail. The answer further alleged that the plaintiff was not a holder of the note in due course…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Beachy v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. Lindley v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  3. Leach v. UrschelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Hogg v. WhithamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  5. Draper v. CowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ablah v. EymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Gas Service Co. v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  3. Rockhill, Administrator v. TomasicSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  4. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc. v. LucasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Runnels v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API