State ex rel. Manchester Improvement Co. v. City of Winchester
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Commissioner.
Mandamus to compel respondents to issue a permit. Upon trial the alternative writ *48was quashed and relator’s prayer for an absolute writ was denied. The question is whether Winchester’s zoning ordinance as applied to appellant is unconstitutional and void in violation of Article I, Section 10, Constitution of Missouri, V.A.M.S..
The facts were stipulated: Relator owns Lots 1-10 and 20-27, Block 15, Manchester Hills, a subdivision of land in Winchester, a city of the fourth class in St. Louis County, Missouri, and said real property is zoned “B” Commercial District by…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Flora Realty & Investment Co. v. City of LadueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Huttig v. City of Richmond HeightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Ludlow v. GuffeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Downing v. City of JoplinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Wooten v. Youthcraft Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Strandberg v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Deffenbaugh Industries, Inc. v. PottsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Rubi v. 49'er Country Club Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Steak N Shake, Inc. v. City of Richmond HeightsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- State ex rel. Presbyterian Church of Washington, Missouri v. City of Washington, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.