Legal Opinion

State v. Witchey

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1986No. 15071PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSHEIM, Chief Justice.

The trial court granted Defendant Joel Witchey’s (Defendant) pretrial motion to suppress certain voluntary testimony by Defendant’s former wife (wife). We granted an appeal from that intermediate order and now reverse.

In early January of 1985, Defendant was charged with rape in violation of SDCL § 22-22-1. State alleges Defendant forced a young woman to perform oral sex with him after he followed her into an alley near her home as she returned from work in the late hours of October 6 or the early morning hours of October 7,1979. The evidence will show that Defendant’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Wolfle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Blau v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. KarlenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. ChristianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. State v. TalaricoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. HartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Novotny v. Sacred Heart Health ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API