Legal Opinion

State v. Hart

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1986No. 15223PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

Appellant waived a jury trial and entered into a Stipulation to Facts with the State; he agreed that his guilt or innocence was to be determined by this stipulation. He was found guilty of possessing a controlled substance under SDCL 22-42-5 by the trial court and sentenced to one year in the State Penitentiary. We affirm, deeming there is but one critical issue before us.

This entire appeal centers around the propriety of the trial court’s denial of a Motion to Quash Search Warrant and Suppress Evidence. Appellant’s contention is that the Search Warrant was invalid because…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. United States v. Gregory Scott FerrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. State v. KietzkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. AllenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. HannukselaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. State v. Brings PlentySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. TalaricoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Curran v. PasekWyoming Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API