Legal Opinion

Novotny v. Sacred Heart Health Services

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 2016No. 27615, 27626, 27631PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] In this action against various health organizations and individuals involved at those organizations, Plaintiffs moved to compel production of peer review materials and asked the circuit court to fínd SDCL 36-4-26.1, which grants privilege to peer review materials, unconstitutional. The circuit court determined that the statute was constitutional but only if it applied a “crime-fraud exception.” It determined that the exception had been met and ordered Defendants to produce, without in camera review, “objective information gathered or considered by the peer review…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kyllo v. PanzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. KarlenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Andrews v. Ridco & Twin City Fire Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. McGee Ex Rel. Estate of McGee v. Bruce Hospital SystemSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. RodenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Issuance of a Summons CompellingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Henning v. Avera McKennanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Matter of M.M.W. & WilkieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Matter of M.M.W. & WilkieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Wipf v. AltstielSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API