Legal Opinion
Hurley v. Hinckley
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 12, 1970No. Civ. A. 69-88, 69-100PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FRANK J. MURRAY, District Judge.
These are two actions, each brought under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking injunctive relief under Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281, 2284 and 1343(3), and declaratory relief pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 2201, against certain Massachusetts State and Town officers and employees. In Civil Action No. 69-88-M (“Barn-stable case”) plaintiffs seek to restrain the defendants from prosecuting, and from threatening further prosecution of them in the Massachusetts courts for vio lations of Massachusetts General Laws, chapter 266, section 120 (trespass statute),…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Alexis v. McDonald's Restaurants of Massachusetts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- State v. MarleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
- Albany Welfare Rights Organization v. George K. Wyman, Individually and as Commissioner of Social Services for Thestate of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Commonwealth v. JarrettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- City of Baton Rouge v. RossSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.