Legal Opinion
In Re 620 Church Street Building Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 9, 1936No. 271PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes
In this proceeding under § 77B of the Bankruptcy Act, the District Court confirmed a plan of reorganization. Petitioners asked the Circuit Court of Appeals to allow an appeal upon the ground that the plan was unfair and inequitable and deprived them of their property without due process of law in violation of the Fifth Amendrnent. Bankruptcy Act, §§ 24 (b), 77B (k); Meyer v. Kenmore Hotel Co., 297 U. S. 160, 165, 166. Leave to appeal was denied. In view of an asserted conflict with the decision of this Court in Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford, 295 U. S. 555, and with that of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Plymouth Coal Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- In Re ChetwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Southern Railway Co. v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- American Construction Co. v. Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Holiday v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Helvering v. Alabama Asphaltic Limestone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- House v. MayoSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.