Glazier v. State

CARDINE, Justice.

Appellant seeks review of his conviction for aggravated vehicular homicide under W.S. 6-2-106(b). He contends that the evidence was not sufficient to convict and that causation was not proven. He also argues that the statutory presumption that a person with a blood alcohol content of .10 percent is impaired, is an impermissible mandatory presumption.

We affirm.

Appellant raises the following issues:

I. Whether the trial court’s decision must be reversed based on insufficiency of the evidence.

A. Whether the injuries sustained by both Mr. Glazier and Ms. Davis are consistent with…