Legal Opinion

Scott v. City of Seattle

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided December 13, 1999No. C98-1345RPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART CITY OF SEATTLE’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND REMANDING OTHER CLAIMS TO STATE COURT

ROTHSTEIN, District Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the court on defendant City of Seattle’s (“City’s”) motion for partial summary judgment and motion to strike Exhibit C from the declaration of attorney James Klauser and on plaintiffs Davis’ and Norris’ cross-motion for partial summary judgment and an order in limine. Having considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motions, the court rules as…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nieshe v. Concrete School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  2. Johnson v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Nieshe v. Concrete School Dist.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Tyko Johnson, App. v. City Of Seattle, Dept. Of Planning And Development, Res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API