Legal Opinion

Tyko Johnson, App. v. City Of Seattle, Dept. Of Planning And Development, Res.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 13, 2014No. 68819-7Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON TYKO JOHNSON, No. 68819-7-1 (consolidated with No. Appellant, 68994-1-1) o*>c DIVISION ONE o- — GO CITY OF SEATTLE, PUBLISHED OPINION •:.-0f 35= Respondent. CO FILED: October 13, 2014 ^ U2 Appelwick, J. — Johnson was cited by the City for parking more than three vehicles on his single-family lot. He subsequently established that he had a vested right to a legal nonconforming use to park five additional cars on his lot. Under the City's ordinance scheme, Johnson was unable to present evidence of his nonconforming use as a defense to his…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API