Legal Opinion
Powell v. Eckler
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error to Jackson. (Peck, J.) Eeplevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.
On the 28th day December, 1889, the following agreement was made between the Whitney & Courier Company and N. H. Eckler:
“ This agreement, made this 28th day of December, 1889, between the Whitney & Courier Co., of the city of Toledo, state of Ohio, parties of the first part, and N. H. Eckler, of Jackson, Mich., party of the second part, witnesseth:
“ That the said Whitney & Courier Co. have leased unto the party of the second part one Boardman & Gray piano, style 11, walnut, No. 16,646, branded, ‘ Boardman & Gray, of Albany, N. Y./ for the term of five months from date hereof, for the sum of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Richardson v. HardwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Whitaker v. . WhitakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Couse v. TregentMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by5 opinions
- Knights v. PiellaMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Pettyplace v. Groton Bridge & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Wickes Bros. v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Ferch v. HillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Farmers' Elevator Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1919