Whitaker v. . Whitaker
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The sole question in this case is, whether a meritorious consideration is sufficient in equity to sustain a promissory note given by a husband to his wife as against his collateral heirs.
The note cannot be sustained as a donatio mortis causa. That is not pretended; nor as a payment for a debt, though that is claimed. But I agree with the Supreme Court, that there is no ground for that claim. If a wife can be said to be entitled to higher consideration or compensation because she labors in the field instead of in her household (which I do not perceive and cannot admit), the law makes no such…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harris v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Hunt v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Duvoll v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1850
- Wright v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1823
- Buford's Heirs v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1833
3Cited by36 opinions
- Coleman v. . BurrNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Claim of Wilbur v. Estate of WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of CallisterNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Blaechinska v. Howard Mission & Home for Little WanderersNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.