Legal Opinion

Whitaker v. . Whitaker

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1873PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The sole question in this case is, whether a meritorious consideration is sufficient in equity to sustain a promissory note given by a husband to his wife as against his collateral heirs.

The note cannot be sustained as a donatio mortis causa. That is not pretended; nor as a payment for a debt, though that is claimed. But I agree with the Supreme Court, that there is no ground for that claim. If a wife can be said to be entitled to higher consideration or compensation because she labors in the field instead of in her household (which I do not perceive and cannot admit), the law makes no such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harris v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  2. Hunt v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. Duvoll v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Wright v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  5. Buford's Heirs v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1833

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Coleman v. . BurrNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Claim of Wilbur v. Estate of WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of CallisterNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Blaechinska v. Howard Mission & Home for Little WanderersNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API