Legal Opinion
Gentlemen's Resale West v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 15, 1972No. Civ. 39416PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTH, P. J.
On June 22, 1971, Edson Stroll (Stroll), the real party in interest in this proceeding for mandate, sued Gentlemen’s Resale West (petitioner) and concurrently attached petitioner’s place of business, installing a keeper. The attachment was released by the sheriff on June 28 pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 540 when petitioner deposited a cash bond with the sheriff. On September 23 pursuant to motion theretofore made on the ground that the attachment was unconstitutional under the holding of Random v. Appellate Department, 5 Cal.3d 536 [96 Cal.Rptr. 709, 488 P.2d…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Simmons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Urich Oil Co. v. Crown Discount Department StoresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Ataka America, Inc. v. Crateo, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- Bussell v. Union BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976