Legal Opinion

Ookala Sugar Plantation Co. v. Wilson

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1900PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Exceptions from Circuit Court, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

PREAR, C.J.

This is an action of assumpsit brought by the plaintiff as tenant of the defendant to recover an alleged excess of rent claimed to have been paid under, a mutual mistake of facts.

*128The defendant leased to the plaintiff' the land in the District of Iiamalrua, Island of Hawaii, covered by Royal Patent (Or.) 2316 to Kama and Peniamina, at an annual rental of seven dollars per-acre. The plaintiff paid rent eight years and a half for an area represented by A B O E on the diagram and then

*129claimed that the true area was as represented by A B O D, the difference in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hall v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Yoshie Miyasato Hokama v. Relinc Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Kaneshiro v. YamashiroHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Application of Sing Chong Co., Ltd.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Apo v. Dillingham Investment CorporationHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Galt v. WaianuheaHawaii Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API