Dinnie v. Johnson
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Pembina County; Sauter, J. Action by John Dinnie and another against O. H. Johnson. There was a judgment for plaintiffs, and from an order granting a new trial plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtWallin, J.
This action was tried to a jury,.and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiffs. A motion to vacate the verdict and for a new trial was made, and was based upon affidavits setting out newly-discovered evidence, and upon a statement of the case settled *154by the trial court. The defendant’s notice of intention to move for a new trial embraced, with other grounds of the motion, the following, namely: First,-newly-discovered evidence; second, insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict; and, third, errors of law occurring at the trial, and excepted to by the defendant. The only errors of law…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Caulkins v. . HellmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Stone v. . BrowningNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Gull River Lumber Co. v. Osbrone McMillan Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Taylor v. MuellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Patch v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sonnesyn v. AkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Grant v. MilamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Ross v. RobertsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Reeves & Co. v. BrueningNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Boschker v. Van BeekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.