Legal Opinion
HARRY A. v. Duncan
District Court, D. Montana
Decided January 13, 2005No. CV 03-13-H-DWMPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MALLOY, Chief Judge.
I. Introduction
These high school girls and their parents bring this case seeking money damages against the Powell County School District and Powell County High School (“PCHS”) officials Rick Duncan, Donald McDermid, Pat Bannon, Ron Fuhrman (through his estate) and Joseph Brott for injuries that stem from the locker room videotaping scheme carried out by male PCHS students from October 2000 until November 2002. The case is based on claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 1 for civil rights violations, as well as pendent claims for damages under Montana state law. Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rabinovitz v. City of L. A.District Court, C.D. California · 2018
- Peschel v. City of Missoula ex rel. Missoula Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2009
- Harry A. v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Oyarzo v. Tuolumne Fire DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Peschel v. City of Missoula Ex Rel. Missoula Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.