Legal Opinion
Harry A. v. Duncan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 4, 2007No. 05-35206PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The memorandum disposition filed on March 27, 2007, 2007 WL 983301, is amended as reflected in the amended disposition filed along with this order. The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are otherwise DENIED. See Fed. R.App. P. 35; Fed. R.App. P. 40. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained.
AMENDED MEMORANDUM**
1. The boys who did the videotaping did not do so based on power “possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because the wrongdoer is clothed with the authority of state law.” West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 49, 108 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Van Ort v. Estate of StanewichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rabinovitz v. City of L. A.District Court, C.D. California · 2018
- FUNEZ EX REL. FUNEZ v. GuzmanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2009
- G.L. v. CatanioDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Juan Francisco Martinez v. City of StocktonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022