Haman v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, the complaint reinstated and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The verdict was inconsistent in holding Humble Oil and Refining Co. (Humble) liable for negligence, while exonerating Scarsdale Landscaping, Inc. (Scars-dale). At the least Scarsdale had a contractual obligation to indemnify arid hold harmless Humble from any and all loss or damage occasioned by or in connection with the work performed by Scarsdale of snow and ice removal, and sanding, upon request. The liability, if any, of Humble to plaintiffs…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Mead v. Warner Pruyn DivisionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Kirby v. Rouselle Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1981
- Chandler v. Northwest Engineering Co.New York Supreme Court · 1981
- Kotopoulos v. Nathan Hale Gardens, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Mesuraca v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.