Legal Opinion
Mesuraca v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 22, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant third-party plaintiff New York City Transit Authority appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), entered June 29, 1988, as, upon a jury verdict finding it 60% at fault in causing the damages of the plaintiff Salvatore Mesuraca and the third-party defendant Doyle-Baldante, Inc., 40% at fault, and upon an order denying its posttrial motion for full common-law indemnification from Doyle-Baldante, Inc., is in favor of it and against Doyle-Baldante,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Guzman v. Haven Plaza Housing Development Fund Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Compania Transatlantica EspanolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Haman v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Johnson v. Artkraft Strauss Sign Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Francavilla v. Nagar Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brust v. Estee Lauder Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Creamer v. Amsterdam High SchoolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Stevanoff v. Boys & Girls ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993