Legal Opinion
Fortune v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 14, 1989No. 1 CA-SA 88-244PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Judge
This is a special action from the trial court’s order denying defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment, which motion sought to release a mechanic’s and materialmen’s lien recorded by the plaintiff/real party in interest, Million Development Company (Million). The issue raised is whether the trial court erred in failing to find the lien invalid as a matter of law.
Procedural Background
This special action arises out of an action brought by Million against petitioners, Robert L. Fortune and Joan E. Fortune (Fortunes), for breach of a contract that provided for Million…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Super. Ct. in & for Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Price v. SunmasterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Lanier v. LovettArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- Hayward Lumber & Investment Company v. GrahamArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Surf Properties v. Markowitz Bros.Supreme Court of Florida · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tilt-Up Concrete, Inc. v. Star City/Federal, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- United Metro Materials, Inc. v. Pena Blanca Properties, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Zepsa Construction, Inc. v. RandazzoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Zepsa Construction, Inc. v. RandazzoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003