Trewatha v. Buchanan Gold Mining & Milling Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County, and from an order denying a new trial. ■ The facts are-stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.—
After full consideration of this cause in Bank, we are satisfied with the conclusion reached in Department Two, and with the opinion prepared in Department by Commissioner Belcher. For the reasons given in that opinion, the judgment and order appealed from are reversed, and the cause remanded.
The following is the opinion above referred to, rendered in Department Two on the 16th of December, 1891:—
Belcher, C.
— The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries received by him while he was employed in defendant’s mine, known as the Buchanan Mine, in Tuolumne County. It…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Congrave v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- McLean v. Blue Point Gravel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1876
- Kevern v. Providence Gold & Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1886
- Collier v. SteinhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cole v. German Savings & Loan Soc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Luman v. Golden Ancient Channel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. PrzezdziankowskiIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Worley v. Spreckels Bros. Commercial Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Stoll v. Daly Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.