Legal Opinion

California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau v. Carter

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1985No. F003416PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANSON (P. D.), Acting P. J.

We review a summary judgment of the Fresno County Superior Court ordering that defendant insured is enjoined *259from seeking to arbitrate the question of entitlement to punitive damages under the uninsured motorist provisions of an automobile insurance policy issued by plaintiff. The trial court also ruled defendant could not recover, under the California uninsured motorist law (Ins. Code,1 § 11580.2) or the policy issued by plaintiff, any punitive damages awarded by an arbitrator based on the conduct of the alleged uninsured motorist.

The question of whether an…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Taylor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Peterson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Laird v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Downey Venture v. LMI Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Rudd v. California Casualty General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Merenda v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Santos v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API