Legal Opinion

Hollingshead v. Hollingshead

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1997No. 96-149PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The question posed in this case is whether periodic payments ordered for child support are to be treated as judgments prior to the effective date of Wyo. Stat. § 20-2-113(a) (Supp.1989). The district court ruled that a periodic child support payment is a liability created by statute and applied the eight year statute of limitations found in Wyo. Stat. § l-3-105(a)(ii)(B) (1988). The result was that payments that became due more than eight years prior to the filing of the motion to enforce the payments were barred. We hold that, in the absence of a statute, a decree for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Resources Co. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Matson v. MatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Nicholaus v. NicholausWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Hiltz v. Robert W. Horn, P.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Huff v. HuffTexas Supreme Court · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wright v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hammond v. HammondWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hoke v. Motel 6 JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Inman v. BoykinWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Hurlbut v. ScarbroughWyoming Supreme Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API