Legal Opinion

Jones v. Wallis

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 2011No. COA10-349PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Where Jones exercised “due diligence” in attempting to locate Wallis for purposes of service of process and Jones complied with all the statutory requirements for service of process by publication, the trial court did not err in denying Wallis’ motion to set aside the entry of default against him. Where the trial court properly denied Wallis’ motion to set aside the entry of default and properly granted summary judgment against Wallis and Rossabi, any issues concerning the execution proceedings are rendered moot.

I. Factual and Procedural History

On 20 September 2004, A.C. Jones…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. PenningtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Correll v. Division of Social ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Fountain v. PatrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. HooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dowd v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  2. North Carolina State Bar v. HunterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. Watauga Cty. v. BealCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. Cty. of Mecklenburg v. RyanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  5. Cty. of Mecklenburg v. RyanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API