State v. Van Hoomissen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Defendant was convicted of the misdemeanor of public indecency in a trial to the court on stipulated facts. ORS 163.465. He appeals and contends that the court erred in failing to dismiss the charge pursuant to ORS 135.703, after he entered into a civil compromise with the complainant. As we held in State v. Dugger, 73 Or App 109, 698 P2d 491 (1985), ORS 135.703 permits civil compromise and dismissal of misdemeanors “for which the person injured by the act constituting the crime has a remedy by a civil action;” it applies only if the crime charged necessarily has only a discrete victim or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State of Oregon v. PirkeyOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. FreelandOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- City of Klamath Falls v. WintersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. DuggerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. SumerlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. AlveyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006