Legal Opinion
The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Indenture Trustee, Under the Indenture, Dated as of May 6, 1998 v. Traffic Stream (Bvi) Infrastructure Limited
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 24, 2001No. 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
BACKGROUND
Traffic Stream (BVI) Infrastructure Limited (“Traffic Stream”), incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, is the parent of four wholly owned Hong Kong subsidiaries. Through these subsidiaries, Traffic Stream owns interests in thirteen Chinese-foreign cooperative joint ventures. Each joint venture is a partnership between one of the Hong Kong subsidiaries and a Chinese partner. The joint ventures are all engaged in the development, construction, and operation of six toll-road projects in China.
The contracts governing the joint ventures guarantee the Hong Kong subsidiaries a fixed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matimak Trading Co. v. Albert Khalily, D/B/A Unitex Mills, Inc., and D.A.Y. Kids Sportswear Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Koehler v. Bank of Bermuda (New York) Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Universal Reinsurance Company, Ltd. v. St. Paul Fire And Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Koehler v. Bank of Bermuda (New York) Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- James I. Wynn, Jr. v. Ac Rochester, General Motors Corporation, Charles Volo, Personally and in His Capacity as Personnel ManagerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Traffic Stream (BVI) Infrastructure Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Jordan (Bermuda) Investment Co. v. Hunter Green Investments Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. Traffic Stream (BVI) Infrastructure Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Rosenblatt v. Ernst & Young International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002