Legal Opinion
Chase Manhattan Bank v. Traffic Stream (BVI) Infrastructure Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 20, 2002No. Docket No. 00-7721PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*529UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.
Plaintiff-appellee Chase Manhattan Bank (“Chase”), acting as trustee, and defendant-appellant Traffic Stream (BVI) Infrastructure Limited (“Traffic Stream”) entered into an indenture agreement on May 6, 1998. Pursuant to this agreement, Traffic Stream issued notes in an aggregate amount of $119,000,000 to various holders to finance a business venture involving the construction of toll roads in the People’s Republic of China. On June 4, 1999, Chase commenced…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kel Kim Corp. v. Central Markets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- 407 East 61st Garage, Inc. v. Savoy Fifth Avenue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Traffic Stream (BVI) Infrastructure Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Indenture Trustee, Under the Indenture, Dated as of May 6, 1998 v. Traffic Stream (Bvi) Infrastructure LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. Traffic Stream (BVI) Infrastructure Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ko v. MesserDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021