Legal Opinion

Moss v. Bjornson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1988No. 16894PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying defendants’ motion to dismiss. This Court granted defendants’ motion for an interlocutory appeal. The sole question presented is whether the dismissal of a court action is mandated where a medical malpractice complaint is filed pri- or to plaintiff’s request for a prelitigation screening panel. We hold that it does not and therefore affirm the district court.

Plaintiff Moss was undergoing surgery to replace a broken prothesis on October 4, 1984, which surgery was aborted and not completed until October 8, 1984.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hartley v. Miller-StephanIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Johnson v. Pioneer Title Co. of Ada CountyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Westerberg v. AndrusIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. James v. BuckIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Bastian v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Northcutt v. Sun Valley Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Ada CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Rudd v. MerrittIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Elliott v. VerskaIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. BeverIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API