Rush v. EASON PLUMBING & ELEC., CONTRACTORS, INC.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Contractor and Surety appeal from a judgment for Subcontractor in a suit on a payment bond, and from a denial of their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial. We affirm.
Subcontractor, Eason Plumbing Electrical Contractors, Inc., sought to recover on a payment bond for work performed and materials furnished in the construction of the Goose Pond Colony and Recreation Complex in Scottsboro, Alabama. Contractor, Chris C. Rush, doing business as the Rush Building Company, Inc., was the prime contractor and the principal under the payment bond.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Louella Starling v. Gulf Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Ritchey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
3Cited by6 opinions
- Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Lloyd Noland Hosp. v. DurhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Independent Life & Acc. Ins. Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Ex Parte EatonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Peak v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.