Legal Opinion

Rush v. EASON PLUMBING & ELEC., CONTRACTORS, INC.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1978No. 77-190PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Contractor and Surety appeal from a judgment for Subcontractor in a suit on a payment bond, and from a denial of their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial. We affirm.

Subcontractor, Eason Plumbing Electrical Contractors, Inc., sought to recover on a payment bond for work performed and materials furnished in the construction of the Goose Pond Colony and Recreation Complex in Scottsboro, Alabama. Contractor, Chris C. Rush, doing business as the Rush Building Company, Inc., was the prime contractor and the principal under the payment bond.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Louella Starling v. Gulf Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Ritchey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Lloyd Noland Hosp. v. DurhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  3. Independent Life & Acc. Ins. Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Ex Parte EatonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. Peak v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API