Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Eaton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 2, 1996No. 1941540PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case, here on certiorari review from the Court of Civil Appeals, presents a question about the power of a trial judge to grant a motion for new trial on the specific ground that the moving parties had been prejudiced by a three-week recess in the middle of the trial, in view of the fact that the moving parties had objected to the trial court's granting of a mistrial requested by the other party during the trial, and had objected to the trial court's offer "on several occasions to grant a mistrial." The issue is whether a party can oppose the granting of a mistrial, assent to a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tucker v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Geter v. Central Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Hall v. HallCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  5. Ritchey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lloyd Noland Hosp. v. DurhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Peak v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  3. Travelers Indem. Co. of Conn. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  4. D & N Trucking, L.L.C. v. BrewerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  5. Eaton v. KennemerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API