Kaup v. Schinstock
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from tlie district court for Holt county: William IT. Wbstover, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.
This is an action to cancel two notes and a mortgage. The plaintiffs prevailed, and the defendants appeal.
In 1902 the parties to this action resided in Cuming county, and had been intimately acquainted for years. In *97December of that year the defendants, for the consideration of $23,040, sold to the plaintiffs a ranch containing about 2,000 acres of land situated in Holt county. In March, 1903, the plaintiffs paid the defendants $9,940 in cash, and in May gave them three promissory notes, two for $5,000 each and one for $3,100. The notes were secured by a mortgage on the land conveyed.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lessee of Hannel v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1846
- Burroughs v. ClanceyIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
- Erickson v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Avery v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863
- Morrow v. HansonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Crossett Lumber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Ed Miller & Sons, Inc. v. EarlNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Francisco v. FranciscoMontana Supreme Court · 1947
- Mettlen v. SandozNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.