AMCAL Multi-Housing, Inc. v. Pacific Clay Products
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
LARSON, District Judge.
This case concerns the liabilities of a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) for hazardous waste it voluntarily cleans up, as well as the extent which the PRP can then recoup such cleanup costs from other parties who are, in whole or in part, responsible for the presence of that waste on the property.
Plaintiffs AMCAL Multi-Housing, Inc., AMCAL General Contractors, Inc., AM-CAL Diversified Corporation, AMCAL…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Regina (Rega) Jablon v. Dean Witter & Co., and Sydney TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Mardan Corporation v. C.G.C. Music, Ltd. And MacMillan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Differential Development-1994, Ltd. v. Harkrider Distributing Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- Basf Catalysts LLC v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Amcal Multi-Housing, Inc. v. Pacific Clay ProductsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007