Amcal Multi-Housing, Inc. v. Pacific Clay Products
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION.
STEPHEN G. LARSON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion for the Court to reconsider its October 10, 2006, Order in light of the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. Atlantic Research Corp., — U.S. —, 127 S.Ct. 2331, 168 L.Ed.2d 28 (2007), so that plaintiffs (some of whom may be considered potentially responsible parties (“PRP”) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”)) may proceed with their existing section 107(a) cost recovery action against…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Atlantic Research Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. Ugi Utilities, Inc., Docket No. 04-2409-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Pinal Creek Group v. Newmont Mining Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Atlantic Research Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.