Legal Opinion

United States v. Clarence Kenneth Gorman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 31, 2002No. 02-50053PublishedCited by 134 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge.

On October 19, 2001, Clarence Kenneth Gorman (“Gorman”) entered a conditional guilty plea, pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(a)(2), to possession of a counterfeit postal key, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1704. Gorman now appeals the two issues he reserved for review: the District Court’s denial of his motion to suppress certain evidence and the denial of his motion to dismiss based on the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161. Gorman argues that the District Court erred by not suppressing evidence police officers seized upon entering a third-party residence pursuant to an…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. Price v. SeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Motley v. ParksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Jeffrey MeekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. HardinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Thomas, AnthonyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API