Toledo Edison Co. v. Roller
Ohio Court of Appeals
1DissentBsowu, J.
The first assignment of error concerns the exclusion of evidence as to sales prices of comparable easements to two separate pipeline companies over the defendants ’ property and neighboring property, and in refusing to permit the condemners’ expert to give his opinion of the value of the Edison easement based upon such easement sales.
Determination of the rules for the admission of evidence that should be fashioned for appropriation proceed ings should always keep in focus the purpose and objective of eminent domain proceedings. The purpose is succinctly expressed in the 5th Amendment of the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. LevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
- City of Los Angeles v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Amory v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- State v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Budney v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.