William Caswell v. Joseph Ryan (Superintendent) Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Chief Judge.
We are once again called upon to examine the actions taken by a state prisoner in state court to determine whether he fulfilled his obligation to exhaust state remedies and avoid procedural defaults as required before a federal court can consider the merits of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
William Caswell, a prisoner in state custody, appeals to this court from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We have jurisdiction to hear this appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
I
Background Facts…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by146 opinions
- Tyrone Werts v. Donald T. Vaughn the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Commonwealth v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Phillip B. Moscato 08126-050 v. Federal Bureau of Prisons L.S.C.I. Allenwood, Phillip B. MoscatoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Thomas McCandless v. Donald T. Vaughn the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania District Attorney for Philadelphia CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Lisa Michelle Lambert v. Charlotte Blackwell, Mrs., Superintendent the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.