Legal Opinion

Rea v. Algren

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 1908No. Nos. 15,641—(162)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover $60 for two months’ rent. The case was tried before Charles D. Smith, J., who made findings and as conclusion of law ordered judgment in favor of defendant. From an order denying plaintiff’s motion to amend the conclusions of law or for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.

Plaintiff and appellant sued for two months’ rent of premises which the defendant and respondent had abandoned. The lease was oral and from mónth to month. Defendant asserted, by way of answer, inter alia, that the premises had become untenantable because of a leaky roof and defective plumbing, both of which plaintiff had promised and failed to repair. The trial court found as facts, inter alia, that plaintiff agreed to make repairs, especially as to plumbing and fixing the roof; that “the plumbing in the bathroom was not in proper condition, in that when the bath tub was used the water would…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lynch v. CurfmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Minneapolis Co-operative Co. v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Bass v. RollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. Long v. GierietSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Damkroger v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Reste Realty Corporation v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  2. Shindler v. MildenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Sewell v. HukillMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Genesco Inc. v. Monumental Life Insurance Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1983
  5. Clark v. Rochester Farmers Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API