Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Curfman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 19, 1896No. Nos. 9876-(192)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Clay-county, in favor of defendant, after a trial before Searle, ’J., and a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The intervenor bought from plaintiff a secondhand threshing machine, for the purchase price of which he gave his-note for $150, and as security for its payment assigned to plaintiff a note for $200, secured by chattel mortgage on a span of horses and dray, executed to him by the defendant, Charles Curfman. As this-machine failed to do good work, the intervenor shortly afterwardsbought of plaintiff a new machine, the regular price of which was-$510. The order and contract of purchase of the new machine is Exhibit A in the paper book. On the delivery of the machine the intervenor executed to…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bekkevold v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Mulcahy v. DieudonneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Nave v. PowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Leonard Seed Co. v. Crary Canning Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. MahonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API