Legal Opinion

In re Carr

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1864PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Probate Court, Sacramento County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. Robinson & McConnell, and C. G. W. French, for Appellants, cited sections fifty-two to sixty-eight of the Act to regulate the settlement of the estates of deceased persons, and In the Matter of the Estate of Pacheco, 23 Cal. 476, and Cooper v. Lowerre, 1 Barb. Ch. R. 45, and Harrison v. McMahon, 1 Bradford, 282.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Sawyer, J.

Michael Carr died intestate in the County of Sacramento, leaving a sister, Dorothy Bolton, wife of George Bolton, residents of Sacramento County; a brother, Mark Carr, a resident *586of Sonoma County, and several married sisters in England, but no other relations in the State of California.

George Bolton, husband of said Dorothy Bolton, and F. McComber, Public Administrator of Sacramento County, each applied for letters of administration. Upon a hearing on the several petitions, it was ordered that letters issue to George Bolton. George Bolton afterwards, as appears by the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Abrahams v. HosselkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Monroe v. ShielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Estate of MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  4. Reilly v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Estate of BarrettCalifornia Superior Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API