Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Murphy v. Morley

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1957No. 6222PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUJAN, Chief Justice.

This action was prosecuted under Section 40-34-15, N.M.S.A.1953 Compilation, providing for the abatement of a nuisance connected with “lewdness”, “assignation” or “prostitution”. The trial court found that the San Jose Drive-In Theater permitted the showing of indecent, obscene, and immoral pictures through use of the motion picture screen and advertising on the premises, and enjoined the management or “anyone acting in his place and stead” from maintaining or operating the theater in such a manner as to permit lewdness.

The case is interesting in view of the United States…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Gelling v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Board of Supervisors v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Matter of StrykerNew York Court of Appeals · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. NICK R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People Ex Rel. Busch v. Projection Room TheaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Huey v. LenteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney v. LevenburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecutor v. Diversified Theatrical Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API